|
AACN Issue Bulletin
March 1996
Seeing Hospital Readmissions
Cut and Other
Savings, Employers Move Advanced Rns
From Alternative to Mainstream
As lawmakers are learning, revamping Medicare
will mean more than making the smartest use of the system's
constricted health care dollars for the nation's elderly. With
recent and dramatic shifts in how and where health care is delivered,
observers say the time is overdue to overhaul Medicare's lesser-known
side -- the system's support of training for health care providers
who deliver that care. Increasingly, policymakers note, Medicare's
expenditures for health professions education have grown irrelevant
and misdirected.
Since its creation in 1965, Medicare has reimbursed
hospitals for a portion of the clinical, classroom, and other
costs to train nurses, physicians, and other health personnel
with the aim of delivering quality inpatient care to Medicare
recipients. Indeed, at $175 million annually, Medicare is
the largest single source of federal support for training
the largest health profession -- registered nurses. However,
70 percent of every Medicare dollar for nursing education
goes to hospital diploma programs that produce less than 10
percent of all RNs. Moreover, those programs are concentrated
in three states that received nearly half (48 percent) of
Medicare funds for diploma nursing education in 1991, according
to a recent study in the Journal of the American Medical
Association. In addition, diploma training is geared
to the needs of a dwindling inpatient population and fails
to meet the more sophisticated requirements of current-day
patient care, claim educators who are seeking to redirect
Medicare funding to instead prepare nurse practitioners (NPs),
certified nurse-midwives (CNMs), and other RNs with advanced
practice skills.
Expanding the Primary- and Acute-Care Pools
While news stories are reporting how Medicare
redesign may ultimately affect support for physician residencies
at teaching hospitals, nursing and other health care leaders
are focusing on a concern equally as big -- working to ensure
a sufficient supply of advanced practice nurses (APNs) to care
for an increasingly outpatient world where more needs of current
and future Medicare patients will lie. With front-line primary
care becoming more dominant and hospitals focusing more on acute
care for the sickest and most unstable patients, such venues
as home care, overnight surgical centers, community health facilities,
birthing centers, and other outpatient facilities are providing
services once delivered routinely in hospitals. Moreover, growing
specialization among physicians, faster discharge of hospitalized
patients to other sites in the community, and the accelerating
moves to managed care, disease prevention, and cost-efficiency
are fueling the demand for advanced RNs even further.
Prepared mostly in master's-degree programs,
advanced practice nurses also include clinical nurse specialists
and certified registered nurse anesthetists. Using Medicare
to support the education of APNs makes sense for a health
system so concerned with the competing interests of quality
and cost, many policymakers say. Further, they add, that support
would aid the preparation of nurses in greatest demand by
Medicare patients, such as nurse practitioners and clinical
nurse specialists to deliver primary care, manage chronic
health conditions affecting older people, and educate patients
on how to avoid injury and the expense of hospitalization
and nursing home care. Even within hospitals, the growing
ranks of acute-care nurse practitioners not only are coordinating
and providing direct care for inpatients and following those
patients post-discharge, but are carrying out roles once reserved
for medical residents, such as diagnosing and treating acute
health problems.
In a 1994 report, the Pew Health Professions
Commission called for doubling the number of nurse practitioner
graduates by the year 2000 to offset the shortages of primary
care physicians in major metropolitan centers, rural sites,
and inner cities. Moreover in fall 1995, in an effort to further
balance the nation's nursing pool, the commission urged dramatic
reductions in the number of diploma and associate-degree training
programs for RNs. Although it stressed that registered nurses
should be prepared at different educational levels to fill
different roles, the commission recommended that up to 20
percent of diploma and associate-degree programs should be
closed in favor of expanded numbers of master's-degree nurse
practitioner programs and increased federal support for NP
students. Continued proliferation of two-year associate degree
programs will not "adequately address the potential opportunity
and enormous demands that will be placed on nursing in the
future," the Pew Commission noted. In particular, the commission
projected "important gains by nursing in primary care settings
as nurse practitioners and nurse midwives are permitted wider
ranges of practice and RNs move into community and ambulatory
care settings."
Changes Seen Locally
Increasingly, managed care companies and
other provider institutions are seeing the advantages of boosting
their APN staffing. Mounting studies report that the quality
of care by nurse practitioners is at least equal to, and at
times better than, comparable care by physicians and often at
lower cost. Even after acknowledging the methodological flaws
of some of the studies it reviewed in 1986, the congressional
Office of Technology Assessment concluded that nurse practitioners
can deliver as much as 80 percent of the health services, and
up to 90 percent of the pediatric care, provided by primary
care physicians. One recent estimate by economist Len Nichols
of Wellesley College projected that underuse of nurse practitioners
costs the nation nearly $9 billion annually due to practice
restrictions by states and other "denied access" for consumers
that is keeping the cost of basic health care inflated.
OTA also found that certified nurse-midwives
manage normal pregnancies safely and as well or better than
do physicians. Moreover, after controlling for patient risk,
a recent analysis of 15 studies published in Nursing Research
and funded by the American Nurses Association found that CNMs
used fewer medications and less fetal monitoring, induced
labor less frequently, and achieved fewer low-birthweight
deliveries than did physicians.
"A lot of what we're doing is pilot
programs. If insurers like what they see, they'll come on
board," says Susan Houston, director of outcomes management
and research at St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital in Houston,
Texas. In one program, a hospital nurse practitioner is helping
congestive heart failure patients avoid readmission with in-home
visits that include exercise, education on medication use,
and access to other community resources such as Meals on Wheels.
Why did cardiologists readily agree to nurse practitioners
providing these patients with in-clinic and at-home care?
"They had a mutual understanding [with
the nurses] and an acceptance that these patients often didn't
need to be in the hospital, that it drives up costs," Houston
says. "Sometimes these patients are not as severely ill as
one might think." Often treatment requires only that medication
be adjusted, "which can be done on an outpatient basis," Houston
says.
Under St. Luke's outcomes management program,
advanced practice nurses work to control patient and hospital
outcomes by identifying the best practices. Each of the hospital's
seven clinical nurse specialists and three nurse practitioners
heads a collaborative practice team. "Each one has to get
a multidisciplinary team together and determine the processes
that drive the outcome," Houston says. APNs at St. Luke's
need an interdisciplinary perspective "so they know how a
respiratory therapist, physician, or physical therapist thinks."
One initiative, set up by a clinical nurse
specialist, has reduced stays for hip and knee replacement
surgery from six days to three with visits by nurses who check
patients' homes for safety, ensure that caretakers are available
and capable, and encourage patients to attend classes on how
to prevent falls and mind other safety concerns. Since its
inception a year-and-a-half ago, no falls, readmissions, or
infections have been reported for the program's 80 patients.
After St. Luke's physicians opposed frequently
used treatments at other hospitals that produced fast discharge
of coronary artery bypass graft patients, such as with short-acting
anesthetics or steroids to promote quick healing, clinical
nurse specialists developed an alternative plan of care. "When
they left [other facilities], these patients would return
home and often crash," Houston says. But by selecting lower-risk
patients, using techniques such as "active awakening" (talking
patients through removal of a breathing tube), mobilizing
them earlier, and with better timing of pain medication, St.
Luke's CNSs have reduced these patients' stays from an average
of eight days to four or five and cut recovery-room time from
two days to one.
Support for APN Care Grows
Elsewhere, researchers at the University
of Rochester reported that intensive-care babies cared for by
neonatal nurse practitioners averaged 2.4 fewer hospital days
and more than $3,400 less in charges than those cared for by
medical residents, despite the fact that the nurse practitioners'
infants were younger and had significantly lower birthweight.
Because residents rotate every 30 days, they can't follow the
smaller, sicker infants throughout their entire stay, the authors
suggest in explaining the findings of the 1994 study. Since
nurse practitioners don't rotate, they are "more consistent
caregivers," are more familiar with patient needs, and need
to rely less on support services to stay apprised of a patient's
progress. In addition, "neonatal nurse practitioners are not
learners" and so have more established technical skills than
those of residents, explains Linda Cronenwett, director of research
and education at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center in New Hampshire.
Other recent studies report similar findings.
Although physicians provided 66 percent of visits during one
period in 1994 at Harvard Community Health Plan, an HMO in
Boston, Massachusetts, only 28 percent required the services
of an MD, according to an analysis by plan managers in the
journal HMO Practice. More than half (52 percent)
of plan physicians said their visits could have been handled
by nurse practitioners or physician assistants. "It may be
possible to increase the use of NPs and PAs if we can educate
members, particularly younger women, about the role of NPs
and PAs so as to encourage their preferentially selecting
these practitioners for their routine care," the authors wrote.
Another Massachusetts HMO found that the average
cost of nursing home patients was 42 percent lower when care
was provided by a team of a physician and geriatric nurse
practitioner (GNP) than by an MD alone. According to a 1992
study in HMO Practice, each patient of a GNP-MD team
at Worcester-based Fallon Healthcare System cost $3,460 per
year compared to $5,993 for patients receiving physician care
alone. Savings stemmed mostly from lower emergency room use,
fewer hospital transfers, and shorter hospital stays. Moreover,
the authors report, costs were kept trim largely because patients
received "good episodic care" by nurse practitioners on site
and were followed so closely by GNP-MD teams that fewer referrals
to specialists were needed. Fallon's savings of more than
$217,000 more than offset the salaries of the three GNPs,
whose fee-for-service practices also generated an additional
$30,000 in revenues.
Across town, nurse practitioners not only
are performing initial history and physicals on general surgery
patients at Worcester's Med Center hospital, but in the neurosurgery
unit, saved the hospital approximately $25,000 per year in
treatment of back surgery patients, according to a report
in the journal Nursing Economics. Standing orders
for physical therapy consultations were eliminated when a
nurse practitioner, reviewing patients' charts, noticed that
nurses already had provided patients with bed mobility and
other exercise instructions normally given by physical therapists.
Adding nurse practitioners to the surgical team "is not another
layer of health care workers doing tasks," the authors say,
but is part of the process of re-inventing health delivery
"to focus on patient outcome rather than the activity of the
health care provider."
Securing Change Legislatively
With the failure of the 103rd Congress to
pass health care reform legislation, efforts by the American
Association of Colleges of Nursing and other organizations
are focused on redirecting Medicare funds for diploma education
into APN programs. Medicare funding is on-going and not subject
to the uncertainties of annual appropriations decisions, AACN
points out. In addition, such a redirection would require
no new money and allow for additional clinical faculty to
expand the number of APNs in training, thus helping to eliminate
the waiting lists that all graduate nursing programs are experiencing.
Indeed, AACN adds, Medicare reimbursement would give practice
sites an incentive to take on additional students for clinical
training, particularly as the numbers of specialty physician
residencies likely are reduced.
AACN has won backing for the redirection from
other organizations, including the Association of Academic
Health Centers and the American Association of Nurse Anesthetists.
Supporting APN education with Medicare dollars also has been
urged by the advisory Tri-Council for Nursing which, together
with AACN, includes the American Nurses Association, American
Organization of Nurse Executives, and National League for
Nursing.
With federal estimates suggesting the nation
currently needs an additional 100,000 primary care providers
to meet desired levels, AACN has recommended that 70 percent,
or 70,000 of these providers should be nurse practitioners
and certified nurse-midwives. To help generate that supply,
AACN not only has called for an infusion of Medicare monies
into APN education, but is urging that Medicare dollars --
now restricted to hospitals and other inpatient facilities
-- also be channeled to clinical training of advanced practice
RNs at community clinics, HMOs, nursing-school-operated nursing
centers, and other primary care settings that deliver care
to Medicare recipients.
Moreover,
AACN is pressing for passage of the Senate's seven-year Budget
Reconciliation Act, which would extend Medicare reimbursement
for nurse practitioners beyond the current rural-area limitation
to all outpatient sites, regardless of location. The move
would not only boost patients' access to needed primary care,
AACN says. It also would supply additional funds to support
nursing schools' nurse-managed clinics that already are servicing
Medicare patients.
|